WCPanelIQ
En BancGranted

General Casualty Insurance And Regent Insurance, Petitioners

GENERAL CASUALTY INSURANCE and REGENT INSURANCE, Petitioners v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Respondents. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Respondents. REMEDYTEMP, INC., Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Respondents. JACUZZI INCORPORATED, Petitioner v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and THE CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION, Respondents.

ADJ number
—
Decision date
Date unavailable
District office
—
WCJ
—
Claim administrator
American Home Assurance Company
Commissioners
—
LC §3700LC §4151LC §3352CCR §2252CCR §2256CCR §2257CCR §2259CCR §2260CCR §2261CCR §2262CCR §2263CCR §2264CCR §2265CCR §2266CCR §2267CCR §2268CCR §2269.1CCR §2269.4CCR §2269.7CCR §2269.10CCR §2269.11CCR §2269.13CCR §2269.14

Summary

This is an order from the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division Seven (not a WCAB panel decision), arising from consolidated workers' compensation insurance coverage disputes. The dispute concerns whether special employees can be excluded from coverage under a special employer's workers' compensation insurance policy where general and special employers carry separate policies. The Court granted petitions for rehearing filed by American Home Assurance Company, RemedyTemp, Inc., and Jacuzzi, Inc. (joined by General Casualty Insurance and Regent Insurance) and took judicial notice of correspondence between American Home Assurance and the WCIRB regarding use of California Approved Form No. 11 (CAF-11) to exclude leased and temporary workers. The Court requested that the WCIRB and the California Insurance Commissioner answer four questions about excluding special employees from coverage. Both the WCIRB and the Insurance Commissioner responded that special employees may be excluded and Form No. 11 may be used for that purpose, provided the exclusion complies with applicable regulations and does not leave employees without workers' compensation coverage. The key principle, rooted in Insurance Commissioner Ruling 157 (1967), is that any limitation must be consistent with the Labor Code mandate that every employer fully secure its compensation liability.

Issues

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Holding

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Analysis

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Applicant takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Defense takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Provider takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Similar decisions

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.