WCPanelIQ
PanelDenied

Carper, Mark

MARK CARPER, Applicant vs. NEW YORK YANKEES; TIG/FAIRMONT PREMIER INSURANCE CO., administered by ZENITH INSURANCE CO.; BALTIMORE ORIOLES; TRAVELERS INDEMNITY CORP.; ATLANTA BRAVES; AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., administered by ALLIANZ; NEW YORK YANKEES; CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION on behalf of LEGION INSURANCE COMPANY, in liquidation, Defendants

ADJ number
ADJ13657099
Decision date
Date unavailable
District office
Santa Ana
WCJ
Josephine K. Broussard
Claim administrator
Zenith Insurance Co.; Travelers Indemnity Corp.; Allianz (administering American Insurance Co.); California Insurance Guarantee Association (on behalf of Legion Insurance Company, in liquidation)
Commissioners
—

Injury / body parts: multiple body parts (cumulative trauma)

LC §3600LC §3600.5LC §5300LC §5301LC §5305LC §5412LC §5500.5LC §5900LC §5909

Summary

Mark Carper, a former professional baseball player, filed a cumulative trauma claim for injuries sustained while playing for the Baltimore Orioles, New York Yankees, and Atlanta Braves between February 1991 and October 1996. The WCJ found that California had subject matter jurisdiction because Carper was hired in California (initially recruited and signed by an Orioles scout while in California, with documentary evidence showing a minor league contract signed February 15, 1991, while he was still in California), and found the Atlanta Braves liable under Labor Code section 5500.5. The Braves petitioned for reconsideration, arguing lack of injurious exposure and contract for hire in California, exemption under Labor Code section 3600.5(c), lack of personal jurisdiction, and that liability should relate back to the Orioles. The WCAB denied reconsideration, adopting and incorporating the WCJ's report, holding that a hiring in California established jurisdiction over the entire CT claim regardless of which team was liable, that section 3600.5(c) does not apply when an applicant is hired in California, and that the Braves waived any personal jurisdiction defense by making general appearances and failing to raise it at trial.

Issues

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Holding

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Analysis

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Applicant takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Defense takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Provider takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Similar decisions

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.