WCPanelIQ
PanelGranted

Rodriguez, Ramon

RAMON RODRIGUEZ, Applicant vs. FULLMER CONSTRUCTION, insured by THE HARTFORD; AIREF RIALTO COMMERCE CENTER, LP; FREDI SIERRA ARANA, dba SIERRA DEMOLITION SERVICES, insured by STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND; T9 ENTERPRISES, INC., insured by BENCHMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, administered by BENCHMARK ADMINISTRATORS; ESIQUIO SIERRA; UNINSURED EMPLOYERS BENEFITS TRUST FUND, Defendants

ADJ number
ADJ17236784
Decision date
Feb 16, 2026
District office
Marina del Rey District Office
WCJ
—
Claim administrator
Benchmark Administrators (for Benchmark Insurance Company); State Compensation Insurance Fund; The Hartford
Commissioners
KATHERINE WILLIAMS DODD, COMMISSIONER, JOSEPH V. CAPURRO, COMMISSIONER, CRAIG L. SNELLINGS, COMMISSIONER

Injury / body parts: right hip, pelvis, lower extremities

LC §5909LC §5900LC §5313LC §3600LC §5705LC §2750.5LC §3351LC §3357LC §5705(a)LC §2775LC §7000CCR §10761CCR §10787CCR §10756

Summary

Applicant Ramon Rodriguez was injured on December 26, 2022 while demolishing a shed at a Rialto property owned by AIREF Rialto Commerce Center, which had hired Fullmer Construction as general contractor, who in turn hired T9 Enterprises for demolition work. The WCJ found that applicant was solely employed by Esiquio Sierra, an unlicensed and uninsured individual, and that none of the corporate defendants (Fullmer, AIREF, Sierra Demolition Services, or T9) employed applicant, concluding that the 'ultimate hirer' theory under Blew v. Horner did not apply because there was no proof Esiquio Sierra was employed by any defendant. UEBTF sought reconsideration, arguing the WCJ erred in this conclusion and failed to apply the law regarding ultimate hirer liability and section 2750.5. The Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the F&A, and remanded for further development of the record, finding the conclusion that Esiquio Sierra was the sole employer improbable and noting serious due process deficiencies in that Esiquio Sierra was never properly named, served, or notified that his personal liability was at issue.

Issues

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Holding

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Analysis

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Applicant takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Defense takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Provider takeaway

Member is $25/month or $250/year and includes full case search.

Similar decisions

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.

Member is $25/month or $250/year. Subscribe to view similar decisions.